Advisory, Architecture, Solutions and Assurance.

    Four forms of work across the public and private sectors, with Governance Architecture at the core. Most engagements draw on more than one.

    01

    Advisory

    What is happening, what matters, and what should we do?

    Clarity on complex systemic problems and the events that expose them, from incidents and crises to capital events: what is happening, what matters and what to do, ending in decisions the accountable people own.

    Outcome

    Decisions taken on evidence, by the people accountable for them.

    Relevant standards and frameworks
    • COSO ERM
    • ISO 31000
    • COBIT 2019
    Services
    • Board and Committee Advisory
    • Operating Audits and Structural Diligence
    • Investigation and Diagnosis
    02

    Architecture

    How should this work?

    A defined design: the structures, processes, responsibilities, controls, information and technology through which a company or institution operates coherently. Governance Architecture is HIBS's distinctive discipline, applied with the other disciplines the problem requires.

    Outcome

    A design ready to be put into operation, with governance that works in practice and holds as people and circumstances change.

    Relevant standards and frameworks
    • COSO ERM
    • COBIT 2019
    • ISO 31000
    • ISO/IEC 27001
    • ISO 9001
    • ISO 22301
    • DORA
    • NIS2
    • EU AI Act
    Layers of the architecture

    Governance

    • Governance Structures
    • Responsibility and Accountability
    • Management Mechanisms
    • Transformation Governance

    Operating Structures

    • Operating-Model Design
    • Structural Simplification
    • Process Design
    • Operational Standardisation
    • Service Delivery Structures
    • Service Design and Improvement
    • Integration, Separation and Post-Integration Stabilisation
    • HR Structures and Policies

    Risk, Control and Compliance

    • Enterprise Risk Management
    • Controls
    • Management Systems and Policies
    • Third-Party Risk and Operational Resilience
    • Regulatory Obligations
    • Compliance Programmes
    • Governance and Compliance Office Design
    • Technology and Operational Controls

    Information and Technology

    • Technology Governance
    • Technology Operating Models
    • Information Security Governance
    • AI Governance
    03

    Solutions

    How do we make this available and work in practice?

    Designs put into operation: technology, operating change and interim mandates, purpose-built for a client and handed over.

    Outcome

    The solution in operation, implemented and handed over to the client.

    Relevant standards and frameworks
    • ITIL 4
    • ISO/IEC 20000-1
    • ISO 9001
    • ISO/IEC 42001
    Offerings

    Client Solutions

    • Implementation and Transformation
    • Technology Solutions
    • Operational Excellence
    • Turnaround and Performance Recovery
    • Remediation Under Scrutiny

    Interim Mandates

    • Interim Operating Mandates
    04

    Assurance

    Does this meet the relevant criteria, and what evidence supports that conclusion?

    Independent findings and assurance conclusions on whether governance, controls and operating structures meet their design, their documentation and the standards they are meant to meet.

    Outcome

    An independent opinion that management, boards, investors and regulators can rely on, because it rests on evidence.

    Relevant standards and frameworks
    • ISO/IEC 27001
    • SOC 2
    • ISO 9001
    • ISO 22301
    • ISO/IEC 42001
    The independence boundaryWork HIBS designed or implemented is assured by an appropriately independent provider. HIBS assures only work it did not design or implement.Work HIBS designed or implementedAn independent provider assures itINDEPENDENCE BOUNDARYWork HIBS did not design or implementHIBS Assurance: an opinion on evidence
    Services
    • Independent Audit
    • Assurance Readiness
    • Internal Audit and Control Testing

    A broad perimeter, a strict standard.

    Systems thinking does not confer specialist authority. The disciplines an engagement involves are each held to their own professional standard.

    HIBS takes on work where there is
    1. 01A complex systemic problem
    2. 02The expertise to understand it
    3. 03A credible basis to intervene responsibly, to HIBS's professional standards

    Everything an engagement requires, in one practice.

    • Governance
    • Risk and Compliance
    • Information Security
    • Operations
    • Technology
    • Human Resources
    The engagement pathOne mandate runs from discovery through advisory, architecture and solutions to handover.DiscoveryAdvisoryArchitectureSolutionsHandover
    One mandate, one line of accountability.

    Every discipline the work requires is integrated into a single design, so that the problem is addressed as a whole rather than discipline by discipline. The structures, documentation and evidence remain with the client.

    Standards institutionalise good governance.

    HIBS draws on the standards and frameworks below where they substantively support the work, but does not organise its work around any single standard.

    Approach
    Implemented well, standards create
    • 01Accountability
    • 02Repeatability
    • 03Evidence
    Relevant standards and frameworks
    ISO/IEC 27001ISO 9001ISO 31000ISO 22301ISO/IEC 20000-1ISO/IEC 42001COSO ERMCOBIT 2019ITIL 4SOC 2GDPRDORANIS2EU AI Act

    HIBS exists to solve complex systemic problems.

    An engagement can start with any of the four forms of work and draws only on those it needs. The first conversation establishes which.